Do you want to here a joke? My question, Does chatgpt learn, or just respond?

Do you get bothered by these clickbait apps?

ReSot

The icon for Bard and ChatGPT 4's new icon after the May release seem awfully close. Coincidence or shenanigans?

I know I’m using the free version but this is so inaccurate it’s scary

Tax added to ChatGPT subscription price?

ChatGPT whenever you say something vaguely health related:

Random sampling from probability distributions

What about it?

To me this is the most counterintuitive thing I've yet seen from ChatGPT (3.5 for instance, the free version). Here's the prompt I used on a fresh session: "Generate 60 random numbers coming from an exponential distribution with lambda=6.4. Don't write any code" It outputs some numbers: 0.013, 0.078, 0.266, 0.040, 0.117, 0.283, 0.048, 0.078, 0.181, 0.134, 0.017, 0.160, 0.052, 0.196, 0.096, 0.098, 0.019, 0.048, 0.141, 0.071, 0.106, 0.023, 0.197, 0.062, 0.029, 0.072, 0.111, 0.166, 0.080, 0.027, 0.124, 0.016, 0.135, 0.052, 0.078, 0.161, 0.078, 0.139, 0.068, 0.066, 0.039, 0.056, 0.018, 0.082, 0.180, 0.086, 0.024, 0.022, 0.057, 0.042, 0.050, 0.104, 0.099, 0.062, 0.016, 0.186, 0.043, 0.085, 0.145, 0.110. I get to plot a histogram with the numbers and they are close to what I would consider an exponential distribution with such parameter. Given that GPT 3.5 does not have access to a Python interpreter, how on earth is it able to do so? I have also tried other distributions and parameters and it kind of works. It's not perfect, but with normal distributions it is usually close to what Numpy would generate. I could understand that it can have learnt to interpret Python code to some extent, but honestly I can't find explanation for random sampling from a probability distribution. Any thoughts?

It’s not wrong…

Snapchat's My AI admitted it was GPT 3 after I showed it the prompts directly and asked it.

GPT-4 is Better Without Internet?